CODE OF ETHICS of the INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CORE ENERGETICS |
Approved February 15, 2021 Preamble We also recognize our need for help to deal with our biases, limitations, or blind spots. It is from our desire to be better and to do better that we offer this Code of Ethics. All Core Energetics Institutes and Certified Practitioners wish to improve the experience of the human condition. We do this with an intention to promote an inclusive community, welfare of clients and students, and without discrimination due to race, age, creed, sexual orientation, or gender identity. This ethical code is an aspirational guideline to ensure and support professional development and competence in our field. It must be augmented by following the laws of our state, region and country. Code A. Every Institute must teach about the following Ethical Concepts: B. Competence: C. Human Relationship: D. Confidentiality: 1. As mandated by law; E. Ethical Procedures: F. Public Opinions and Recommendations: G. Ethical Complaints and Violations: H. Ethics of Touch: The use of touch is considered an important tool for Core Energetics practitioners; verbal and written consent is strongly indicated. 1. In sessions, the use of touch is carefully applied, with the intent to allow a better flow of energy in the body and emotions. I. Collegial Relationship: We refer here to the golden rule: we treat others as we would like to be treated. 1. Collegial differs from congeniality: you may not like the other professional, but you deal with them directly and fairly. ADDENDUM Best Practice Recommendations: 1. We recommend for students involved in the training NOT to get involved in sexual relationships with other students. If this happens, it needs to be discussed in the appropriate group. This recommendation seeks to keep the focus on the person in training. 6. Communication with other providers requires a written release of information from the client. .
Institute of Core Energetics Code of Confidentiality
Core Energetics practitioners have a primary obligation and responsibility to take precautions to respect the confidentiality of clients and students with whom they work. These are general guidelines and only lay down a framework for the ICE to guide its internal treatment of faculty, students and staff. We hold confidentiality to mean having another’s trust to not share information obtained in therapeutic sessions, groups, or classes, as further defined in the information below. 1. Confidential information includes all information obtained in the context of the professional relationship. Core Energetics practitioners take appropriate steps to safeguard the confidential information of clients and former clients and to limit access by others to confidential information. 2. Core Energetics practitioners disclose confidential information without the consent of the client as mandated by law, or where permitted by law. Such situations include, but may not be limited to: providing essential professional services to the client, obtaining appropriate professional consultation, or protecting the client or others from harm. 3. The discussion of confidentiality and its limits occurs at the beginning of the professional relationship and thereafter as circumstances may warrant. When appropriate, Core Energetics practitioners clarify at the beginning of treatment issues related to the involvement of third parties. 4. Core Energetics practitioners may disclose confidential information with the appropriate consent of the client (or of another legally authorized person on behalf of the client), unless prohibited by law. A vow of confidentiality by the practitioner can be voided if a client is intending to harm him/herself or another person. Confidential information may be disclosed to the practitioner’s supervisor if the practitioner needs guidance and/or support in working with the client. It is understood that said supervisor is also constrained by the same code of confidentiality. 5. When providing services to several persons who have a relationship (i.e. partners/spouses or parents/children), Core Energetics practitioners attempt to clarify at the outset 1) which of the individuals are clients and 2) the relationship the practitioner will have with each person. This clarification includes the role of the practitioner and the probable use of the services provided or the information obtained. 6. If and when it becomes apparent that the Core Energetics practitioner may be called on to perform potentially conflicting roles (such as marital counselor to spouses, and then support for one party in an ensuing divorce proceeding), Core Energetics practitioners attempt to clarify and adjust, or withdraw from, roles appropriately. 7. In cases where there is more than one person involved in treatment by the same practitioner (such as with groups, families and couples), the therapist obtains an initial agreement with those involved concerning how confidential information will be handled both within treatment and with regard to third parties. 8. Core Energetics practitioners are aware of the possible adverse effects of technological changes with respect to the confidential dissemination of patient information and take reasonable care to ensure secure and confidential transmission of such information. Practitioners who offer services, products, or information via electronic transmission (i.e. video sessions) inform clients/patients of the risks to privacy and limits of confidentiality. 9. Core Energetics practitioners take steps to protect the confidentiality of client records in their storage, transfer, and disposal. They conform to applicable state laws governing the length of storage and procedures for disposal. 10. Core Energetics practitioners take appropriate steps to ensure, as far as possible, that employees, supervisees, interns, assistants, and volunteers maintain the confidentiality of clients. They take appropriate steps to protect the client’s identity or to obtain prior, written authorization for the use of any identifying clinical materials in teaching, writing and public presentations. 11. When working with groups, Core Energetics practitioners explain to participants the necessity of maintaining confidentiality and obtain agreement from group participants to respect the confidentiality and privacy of other group members. They also inform group members that privacy and confidentiality cannot be guaranteed with explanations and clarification as to the limits of confidentiality, i.e. a practitioner can request a vow of confidentiality from all group members, but have no real control over what the individual members discuss outside of group. 12. Core Energetics practitioners and Core student practitioners obtain written consent from clients before taping or filming any session, such consent to include the intended use of the material and the limits of confidentiality. 13. Students enrolled at the Institute of Core Energetics are bound by the structure of this policy. While the administration cannot guarantee complete confidentiality, we encourage students to hold personal information shared in classes and Process Groups as confidential. This means students will not discuss another student’s process or experience with a third party, outside the confines of the group. Recording of classes is prohibited unless authorization is obtained from the teacher and agreed to by the class.
Institute of Core Energetics Termination, Closure & Healthy Separation PolicyThe Institute of Core Energetics (Institute), Institute Faculty Members (faculty) and Core Energetics Practitioners (practitioners) in good standing generally follow the International Association of Core Energetics (IACE) Ethical Guidelines and the United States Association of Body Psychotherapy (USABP) Ethics Guidelines except where Institute policy expressly states differences. In this policy, the Institute also seeks to advance guidelines for termination as well as minimum periods of healthy separation after completing professional work with clients and/or educational work with student practitioners. Ethical Termination and Closure the Institute’s curriculum reinforces the importance of the termination phase of practitioner-client relationship. Research over many decades has consistently demonstrated that transference persists beyond termination, and one must allow for the possibility that the transference takes time to dissolve and may actually intensify after termination. While transference is not necessarily resolved in this evolutionary process, good- enough closure modulates the power of transference to the point where clients can deal more effectively with transferential content. Countertransference and boundaries must be monitored more closely in supportive modalities like Core Energetics in view of the fact that a modicum of transference gratification is part of the Core Energetics process. It’s important to support healthy termination with clients. Ideally best practice should provide clients with a corrective emotional experience regarding endings. Clients and practitioners who avoid it are depriving themselves of the insight and healing the termination phase provides. A healthy separation period supports clients and students to feel and experience the ending of the relationship, to separate from the Practitioner/Teacher, and to develop an expanded sense of self through this separation. 1. Healthy Separation Periods a. CLIENT – PRACTITIONER: With regard to developing personal relationships after ending the professional relationship with a client: ii. Sexual Relationships – [Revised and restated from Section IV of the USABP Ethics Guidelines.] b. FACULTY – STUDENT: With regard to developing personal relationships after ending an educational or supervisory relationship with a. Student Practitioner: c. BOARD SERVICE AND DUAL RELATIONSHIPS Board work is not “energetic process work,” but instead focuses on service to advance the Institute’s mission, vision, values, and is not focused on any individuals’ personal needs. Board members attest to their “Duties of Care, Obedience and Loyalty” while serving as a non-profit Board member. (Visit the Institute of Core Energetics Board Guiding Principles here.) Leaning into the “spirit” of avoiding dual relationships, when possible, and with consciousness of the matters noted above, Institute policy seeks to address the potential for individuals to be nominated for Institute Board service who are in, or ● At the time of nomination, nominees are responsible for disclosing past or current dual relationships with other Board members, the Executive and Academic Directors, current faculty members, or other Institute leaders including the disclosure of past or current therapeutic, business, or other personal relationships. The Nominations Committee leads the nominations process, is responsible for collecting all appropriate documentation, and maintaining the information gathered while working to maintain confidentiality by limiting disclosures to appropriate “need to know” parties, such as the Board Chair, Executive Director or other Nominations Committee members. 2. Violations Violations refer to egregious and potentially harmful behaviors. The following factors need careful consideration in determining whether actions fall into the realm of violations, including: a. Did the action/s cross or are crossing personal or professional boundaries? b. Has the practitioner brought known or suspected countertransference to supervision for exploration, support and professional mentoring? c. Were the actions isolated or pervasive and repetitive? d. Was the practitioner attuned to a former client’s indication/s that attention was or is unwelcome and/or e. Did or are the practitioner’s behaviors causing harm? f. Did the practitioner become conscious of these behaviors as they emerged and attempt to understand them? Suspected violations should be reported in a timely manner to the Ethics/ Personnel Committee Co-Chairs of the Institute’s Board of Directors. Institute faculty members are expected to adhere to this policy as part of their professional affiliation with the Institute. Last Update August 2024
Institute of Core Energetics Harassment Policy
The Institute of Core Energetics [ICE] is committed to a teaching and learning environment where people can achieve their full potential in their personal growth, as a practitioner and/or as a career. The ICE policy on harassment is designed to provide: An environment where it is clear harassment is unacceptable, thereby reducing the chance harassment will occur; and a mechanism to resolve complaints where it is believed that harassment has occurred. Disciplinary action, such as suspension, may be taken to deal with actions or behavior, intentional or unintentional, which results in a breach of this policy. Disciplinary action may also be taken if allegations of harassment are found to be malicious or distressing.
This policy applies to all students, staff, consultants, or volunteers regardless of time of effort (full-time, part-time, or temporary) or role in ICE and relates to harassment perpetrated by: A student against a student. A student against a staff person. A staff person against a student; and/or A staff person against a staff person. Harassment is not confined to senior persons to more junior persons. It can take place between staff persons at the same level of employment or between a more junior staff person to a more senior level person. 3. Harassment Definition For the purposes of this policy, harassment is defined as repeated unwelcomed comments (written or spoken), behavior or actions that are not stopped when requested and which violate an individual’s dignity; and/or creates an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment; and/or interferes with a person’s academic or work performance. It is recognized that in prescribed settings for deep processing of one’s inner psychology (for example, process groups, classrooms, Take A Risk Night, electives or workshops) and under the guidance of trained staff, comments and actions may occur that might cause emotional disturbance in participants. Any such occurrences are to be confined to this setting with trained staff present. Individuals are reminded that they can decline to participate in any process work or stop participating at any point.
For the purposes of this policy, harassment is defined as repeated unwelcomed comments (written or spoken), behavior or actions that are not stopped when requested and which violate an individual’s dignity; and/or creates an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment; and/or interferes with a person’s academic or work performance. It is recognized that in prescribed settings for deep processing of one’s inner psychology (for example, process groups, classrooms, Take Risk Night, electives, or workshops) and under the guidance of trained staff, comments and actions may occur that might cause emotional disturbance in participants. Any such occurrences are to be confined to this setting with trained staff present. Individuals are reminded that they can decline to participate in any process work or stop participating at any point. 4. Responsibility of all Staff, Consultants, Volunteers and Students All staff, consultants, volunteers, and students are responsible to help discourage harassment by others by making it clear that such conduct is unacceptable; and to support colleagues and peers who are taking steps to stop harassment by being sensitive to the reactions and needs of others, and/or discourage the retaliation of perceived harassment. The ICE Executive Director, Academic Director and teachers/consultants are responsible for: Providing an environment where it is clear harassment is not acceptable; Taking action by following procedures (see #8 below) when aware harassment may be or is taking place; Ensuring that staff, consultants and students understand harassment and are aware of their responsibility for trying to prevent and resolve problems; and/or Educating and empowering students, staff, and consultants to prevent harassment and/or to seek intervention support through staff persons or teachers/consultants.
All staff, consultants, volunteers, and students are responsible to help discourage harassment by others by making it clear that such conduct is unacceptable; and to support colleagues and peers who are taking steps to stop harassment by being sensitive to the reactions and needs of others, and/or discourage the retaliation of perceived harassment. The ICE Executive Director, Academic Director and teachers/consultants are responsible for: Providing an environment where it is clear harassment is not acceptable; Taking action by following procedures (see #8 below) when aware harassment may be or is taking place; Ensuring that staff, consultants and students understand harassment and are aware of their responsibility for trying to prevent and resolve problems; and/or Educating and empowering students, staff, and consultants to prevent harassment and/or to seek intervention support through staff persons or teachers/consultants.
During any of the yearly scheduled training weekends; and/or During any event where a staff person or consultant has a position of authority and is representing the ICE, be it for monetary gain or free; and/or During electronic or voice/phone communications.
Examples of harassment include: Sex related harassment: Examples include displaying power over a person because of gender through disparaging gender-related remarks and threatening behavior. Sexual harassment: Examples include unwelcome touch, unwelcome jokes of a sexual nature, inappropriate use of suggestive visual display, intimidating behavior such as asking for, or offering, sexual favors in return for a positive academic assessment or promotion. Harassment on grounds of sexual orientation or gender assignment: Examples include unwelcome jokes, homophobic or gender related remarks, threats to disclose sexual orientation or gender assignment and intimate questions about sexual activity. Racial Harassment: Examples include inappropriate questioning and/or jokes about racial or ethnic origin, intimidating behavior, including threatening gestures. Personal harassment: Examples include making fun of a person’s personal circumstances such as class or family situation. Bullying: This can be both physical and psychological. Examples include unmerited criticism, isolation, gossip, or behavior that is intimidating or demeaning. Harassment of the disabled: Examples include discussion of the effects of a disability on an individual’s personal life, uninvited touching or sharing and inappropriate questioning about the impact of someone’s disability. Age harassment: Examples include derogatory age-related remarks and unjustifiable dismissal of suggestions on the grounds of the age of the person. Stalking: This can be physical or psychological. Examples include leaving repeated or alarming messages on electronic recordings, following people, or approaching others to ask personal information.
The goal of informal processes is to resolve situations of alleged harassment as quickly as possible, in a fair, constructive and respectful manner. The ICE Policy and Procedure Manual provides both a formal and informal resolution process for harassment claims, which should be followed and documented by the Academic Director in concert with the Executive Director and support staff. Informal process: When a student, consultant, volunteer, or staff person of the ICE believes harassment exists, early reporting is of great benefit. Persons should try to: Set a clear boundary to the offender to stop the harassment. Document harassment event as soon as one can. Make a staff person aware of the incident (teacher of class, coordinator and/or supervisor). Not provoke or retaliate. Meet with designated staff person to resolve issues with both parties. At the informal stage of resolution, the person who believes they are experiencing harassment should be encouraged to let the other person know, if appropriate, to resolve the situation. This could be solely between the two people or include the coordinator or teacher of the class where it took place, or other staff person. Meet with designated staff person to resolve issues with both parties. At the informal stage of resolution, the person who believes they are experiencing harassment should be encouraged to let the other person know, if appropriate, to resolve the situation. This could be solely between the two people or include the coordinator or teacher of the class where it took place, or other staff person. If the problem is not resolved and one or both of the parties, feel unable to speak directly with the other the ICE will provide a mediator to try to resolve the issues. If the issue cannot be resolved informally, or if the parties opt out of the informal process and want to address the issue formally, the complaint may be brought to the formal process. Formal Complaint Process: The goal of the formal complaint process is to resolve situations of alleged harassment as quickly as possible in a fair, constructive and respectful manner. The ICE Policy and Procedure Manual provides both a formal and informal resolution process for harassment claims, which should be followed and documented by the Director of Education in concert with the Executive Director and support staff. If the harassment continues after informal steps have been taken, persons should: Document harassment events as soon as is reasonably possible. Report to the Academic Director and/or the Executive Director. File a written complaint with the Academic Director and/or the Executive Director as soon as possible, but within 6 months of the incident. Upon receipt of formal written complain, it is the ICE’s responsibility to address a complaint by: Acknowledging the receipt of the complaint. Review and explore options; and Render a decision and restore well-being to the ICE.
Harassment can lead to civil and criminal claims that are beyond the purview of the ICE and should be taken very seriously by the alleged perpetrator. All Students are expected to thoroughly familiarize themselves with and follow the above codes. We are further guided by the spiritual principles of the Pathwork in its regard for self examination, self-responsibility, respect of community and recognition of life’s imperfections. |